Concept of Liberty | Current Affairs | Vision IAS
Monthly Magazine Logo

Table of Content

Concept of Liberty

Posted 22 Jan 2025

Updated 25 Jan 2025

7 min read

Introduction

Recently, in Arvind Kejriwal vs CBI case, Supreme Court said that Arvind Kejriwal's continued incarceration would infringe upon the right to personal liberty under Article 21. With this and similar other decisions, Supreme Court has upheld the principle of bail as rule and jail as exception, while underlining the sacrosanct nature of the individual's right to personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. 

Concept of Liberty

  • Liberty refers to the state or condition in which an individual has the freedom to act according to their will, without undue restraint or coercion from external forces.
  • There are two aspects to the concept of Liberty (see infographic).
  • Constraints on Liberty: Restrictions on liberty may be imposed by force or government through laws and can also result from social inequality and economic inequality.
    • Need for Constraints: Differences exist between people regarding their ideas and opinions, and there are conflicting ambitions and competition to control scarce resources. 
      • Therefore, every society needs some restraints to ensure that differences may be discussed and debated without one group coercively imposing its views on the other. However, such restraints must be reasonable and justified

Ethical Frameworks surrounding Liberty 

  • John Stuart Mill's Harm Principle: Mill urged for minimal state intervention in the exercise of liberties, arguing that "the only power that can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others". This is called the 'harm principle'.
    • Constraints: Mill believed that that the state or society do not have any justification in restricting self-regarding actions (actions having consequences only for individual actors and nobody else). 
      • However, the state or society can control other-regarding actions (actions having consequences for others).
      • For instance, in Navtej Singh Johar vs. Union of India case, the Supreme Court buttressed its conclusion that the state cannot criminalise homosexuality (self-regarding action) by recalling Mill's theory.
  • Liberty and Rights: Liberty is integrally linked to the rights as the due enforcement of the rights ensures the availability of legitimate freedom to the subjects of the state.
    • Principle-based Framework: Rights framework emphasizes on liberty based on moral principles and human rights, which sometimes are in conflict with one another. 
      • According to it, civil liberty depends upon positive laws such as legal rights.
  • Isaiah Berlin's Ethical Pluralism: It is a political and philosophical theory that there are multiple objective values and principles that are part of humanity's essence.
    • Berlin's value pluralism emphasizes on both positive liberty and negative liberty as fundamental human value. 

Constitutional Framework surrounding Liberty

  • Article 21: It guarantees that no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. It provides one of the most robust legal safeguards for personal liberty.
  • Article 19: It grants freedom of speech and expression without fear of state repression.
    • Mill emphasized that a society that completely suppresses all ideas that are not acceptable today, runs the danger of losing the benefits of what might turn out to be very valuable knowledge.
    • However, Mill also recognized the limits of free speech, particularly in cases where speech could incite violence or harm others such as hate campaigns and hate speeches.
      • To address such issues, the Constitution imposes reasonable restrictions such as preventing speech that incites violence, promotes enmity, or threatens public order.
  • Other Fundamental Rights: Fundamental rights such as Right to Equality (Article 14), Equality of Opportunities (Article 16), Freedom of Conscience (Article 25) etc. also constitute important framework for Liberty.

Key Stakeholders

Stakeholders

Roles/Interests

Ethical Considerations

Individual

  • Primary beneficiary of liberty. 
  • Right to pursue personal freedom and dignified life. 
  • Respecting social norms and moral values. 
  • Not infringing on other individual's liberty. 
  • Ensuring actions do not violate public good. 
  • Exercising freedom with social responsibility. 

Society

  • Preserving order and harmony. 
  • Safeguarding their collective interests like social customs and norms. 
  • Establish reasonable limits on individual liberty and justified collective interest. 
  • Protecting individual liberty.   

Government

  • Upholding law and order. 
  • Safeguarding individual liberty and maintain social order. 
  • Maintaining national security. 
  • Protecting individual liberty, ensuring justice and fairness. 
  • Keep checks and balances on arbitrary exercise of power. 

Judiciary

  • Ensuring rule of law. 
  • Promoting ideals of liberty and justice. 
  • Preserve social interests and ensure public good. 
  • Upholding impartiality and fairness thus ensuring individual rights.  
  • Ensuring accountability of Government. 

Civil Society

  • Protecting and promoting liberties. 
  • Ensuring social justice and raise awareness. 
  • Work transparently and advocate for freedoms without any ulterior motive. 
  • Avoiding conflict of interest in prioritizing public good. 

Ethical Issues associated with Liberty

  • Liberty vs Security: Striking the right balance between protecting individual liberty and ensuring national security is an ethical challenge.
    • Laws like the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the National Security Act (NSA) have been criticized for their misuse in curtailing individual liberties but are deemed necessary for national security.
    • Recently, Supreme Court emphasized that depriving a person of their liberty, even for a single day, is a day too many.
  • Freedom of Speech vs Hate Speech: Rise of social media has led to an increase in hate speech and misinformation but what exactly constitute hate speech is undefined in law. 
    • Thus, it is dependent upon the interpretation of implementing authorities resulting in curtailment of freedom of speech in some cases while non-punishment to actual hate speeches in some other cases. 
  • Cultural traditions vs women's rights: Women and Transgender often face restrictions, social stigma, and non-realization of their fundamental rights due to patriarchal structure of society. 
    • Ethical challenge is navigating between respecting cultural traditions and advancing women's rights and freedom. 
  • Right to Privacy vs Surveillance: Supreme Court has declared the Right to Privacy as a fundamental right but there are concerns on how data of citizens is collected, stored and used by government entities and private sector. 
    • Ethical dilemma for government is to ensure public safety and deliver good governance without violating individual's privacy. 
  • Economic Inequality vs Liberty: Liberty is often linked to economic freedom as it also means opportunity to explore one's full potential in an enabling society. 
    • However, economic inequality hinders that opportunity by limited access to quality education, healthcare, basic infrastructure services like water, sanitation, and electricity etc. 

Description: A diagram of a safety scheme

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Conclusion

The concept of liberty is multidimensional, encompassing both personal autonomy and the ethical responsibility to prevent harm to others. Supreme Court has consistently reinforced the idea that personal liberty is paramount. Philosophically, John Stuart Mill's harm principle offers a critical framework for understanding when and why liberty may be legitimately restricted. Together, these perspectives remind us that liberty, while fundamental, must be balanced with justice and fairness in any democratic society.

Check your Ethical Aptitude

As a district magistrate, you are approached by the police requesting approval to detain a prominent political activist under preventive detention laws. The activist has been organizing large protests against certain government policies, which the police argue could lead to unrest and disruption of public order. However, the activist has not been involved in any violence, and the protests have been largely peaceful so far. 

At the same time, the activist's legal team submits a petition emphasizing their right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19 and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. They argue that any preventive detention would be an unjust violation of these constitutional rights and that the protests are a legitimate expression of public dissent in a democracy.

On the basis of the case study answer the following questions:

  • What ethical principles will guide your decision-making process in this situation?
  • Reflect on John Stuart Mill's harm principle. Would the preventive detention of the activist be justified under this principle? Why or why not?
  • Tags :
  • Article 21
  • Right to Privacy
  • Liberty
  • Mill’s Harm Principle
  • Ethical Pluralism
  • Freedom of Speech
Download Current Article
Subscribe for Premium Features