India’s Act of Balancing Bilateral Relationship | Current Affairs | Vision IAS
Monthly Magazine Logo

Table of Content

India’s Act of Balancing Bilateral Relationship

Posted 22 Jun 2024

Updated 24 Jun 2024

4 min read

Why in the News?

Recently, United States of America warned of potential sanctions on India as it signed Chabahar port deal with Iran.

An infographic titled "Know the term" defines three terms: Strategic Autonomy, Global South, and references the Brandt report. The information highlights state ability for independent policy, countries considered less developed, and economic distinctions from the report.

More on News

  • USA fears that India-Iran Chabahar deal may act against trade sanctions imposed by USA to curb its nuclear programme.
  • Earlier, there were also apprehensions of sanctions on India as per Countering America's Adversaries through Sanctions Act (CAATSA) for purchase of the S-400 missile defence system from Russia (No such sanctions was imposed).
    • CAATSA is a USA federal law in force since 2017, under which the US government can impose sanctions on any country that has "significant transactions with Iran, North Korea or Russia". 
    • It entails economic & financial penalties for any nation that transacts with Russia on arms.
  • Such events, along with the Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Palestine crises, have tested India’s strategies to manage its bilateral relationships with various players in the region as well as the globe.

Strategies Adopted by India in Balancing Bilateral Relationships

  • Maintenance of Strategic Autonomy in international affairs, which has evolved through policies such as doctrine of Non-Alignment.
    • E.g. India maintains its independent relationship with Russia and the US, refusing to let either one dictates its foreign policy.
  • De-hyphenation as a tool to engage with countries involved in conflicts with each other in an independent manner.
    • E.g. India’s relationship with Israel and Palestine stand on its own merits and are independent of each other.
  • Wider diplomatic engagements and outreach. 
    • E.g., in 2022, India was able to evacuate students by Operation Ganga during Russia-Ukraine crisis by engaging with countries such as Russia, Ukraine, USA, Romania, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, etc.
  • Vision of Multi-polarity and Multilateralism offers India great potential to expand cooperation and advance an original outlook.
    • E.g., India’s push for reforms at the United Nations Security Council, World Trade Organization, etc., allows it to engage with like-minded countries worldwide.
  • Offering alternative mechanisms such as Rupee-Rouble trade, Rupee-Rial mechanism enhances India’s credibility in balancing its bilateral relationships.
  • Use of soft power through outreach to diaspora such as NRIs and PIOs, etc. has helped build India’s case at global stage
    • E.g. Indians in the USA lobbied for the Indo-US Nuclear Deal.
  • Playing the Role of Mediator by maintaining a neutral stance and capability to bring diverse stakeholders to the negotiating table.
    • E.g. India's hosting of G20 positioned its role as a dealmaker in a fluid international order. Moreover, India has also been able to project itself as a leader and voice of the Global South. 

Issues and challenges India faces with respect to balancing bilateral relations

  • Accusation of being a “Fence Sitter”:  E.g., Various countries accuse India of being a fence sitter and not taking stand even when it aspires to a world leader.
  • Allegations of Financing Wars in favour of aggressor: E.g., European powers accused India of funding Russia’s War by buying cheap Russian crude oil and not publicly criticising Russia’s act of aggression.
  • Emergence of New Axis: E.g., India’s movement towards USA is leading to development of Russia-China Pakistan axis.
  • Reputational damage: Maintaining neutrality while balancing its bilateral with conflicting nations can impact India’s reputation with said nations.
    • E.g., India did not condemn the USA’s withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which allegedly led to reputational damage, pushing Iran towards China.
  • Dependence on Imports for energy as well as defence at times compromises India’s stand at global position.
    • E.g. Dependence on defence imports from Russia and oil imports from the Middle East at times plays an important role in shaping foreign policy.
  • Emergence of Mini-laterals in the Indo-Pacific, such as QUAD, compromises the ideal vision of global cooperation.

Way forward

  • Emerge as an alternative: India is suitably placed to emerge as an alternative to the US and China, and also focus on representing Global South in an increasingly polarized world order.
  • Strategic Hedging: E.g. Balancing China involves developing the capacity and linkages to counter China's political and military efforts against India, despite maintaining civil diplomatic ties and trade.
  • Self-dependency or diversification of risks: It is especially needed in critical sectors such as defence, energy etc.
  • Following Internationalist and Multi-aligned foreign policy: Such policy can be based on issues-based coalition (E.g. BRICS, QUAD, G20, G7, SCO).
  • Playing leadership role in tackling global challenges: Related to climate change, connectivity, terrorism, supply chain resilience (E.g. Supply Chain Resilience Initiative, Biopharmaceutical Alliance, Asia-Africa Growth Corridor ).
  • Tags :
  • Bilateral Relations
  • balancing bilateral relations
Download Current Article